Live cell flattening — traditional and novel approaches
© Beta et al 2010
Received: 11 November 2009
Accepted: 19 April 2010
Published: 19 April 2010
Eukaryotic cell flattening is valuable for improving microscopic observations, ranging from bright field (BF) to total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Fundamental processes, such as mitosis and in vivo actin polymerization, have been investigated using these techniques. Here, we review the well known agar overlayer protocol and the oil overlay method. In addition, we present more elaborate microfluidics-based techniques that provide us with a greater level of control. We demonstrate these techniques on the social amoebae Dictyostelium discoideum, comparing the advantages and disadvantages of each method.
PACS Codes: 87.64.-t, 47.61.-k, 87.80.Ek
Studies of biochemical reactions are traditionally carried out on large cell populations, typically on the order of a million cells or more. Based on the biochemical data from such studies, systems biology has greatly advanced our knowledge of metabolic pathways and signaling cascades in living cells . Yet, as our understanding of biochemical interaction networks becomes more complete, it is advantageous to complement this progress with fluorescence microscopy experiments that characterize the dynamics of such pathways on the single cell level. With fluorescence microscopy, we can observe the expression levels and localization of tagged proteins in each cell. One also can examine the properties of and interactions between proteins using Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy and Förster Resonance Energy Transfer.
Some of the limitations in live cell microscopy are due to the movement of cells in and out of the plane of focus. To overcome these limitations, cells can be flattened to quasi two-dimensional geometries, ensuring that the cells remain in the focal plane. These flattened geometries have been advantageous for observing the eukaryotic cytoskeleton during chemotaxis and cytokinesis [2, 3]. Recent examples combined cell flattening with Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy to increase the area of observation and keep the cell membrane and cortex in the evanescent field .
In this article, we present a brief review of established overlay approaches for cell flattening. Furthermore, we introduce microfluidic techniques to achieve greater control over the degree of flattening. Each technique is exemplified with a short demonstration using cells of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum . We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each flattening technique. Our aim is to provide a reference for readers from the field of live cell imaging, who require advice in choosing a cell flattening system.
2.1. Cell culture
Experiments were carried out using the AX2 derived, LimE-GFP tagged strain of D. discoideum  and the RI9 derived, cAR1-GFP strain . Cells were cultivated in HL-5 medium (ForMedium) at 22°C on polystyrene dishes (Primaria, Falcon), or shaken in suspension at 150 rpm. Cultivation of the cAR1-GFP mutant required addition of 5 μg/ml G418 (Geneticin, Gibco) to the HL-5 medium. To examine chemotactic cells, the culture was starved in a 20 ml phosphate buffer (PB, pH = 6) shaking cell suspension, prior to each experiment . This suspension was supplied with 60 μl of 18 μM cAMP (Sigma) every 6 minutes to synchronize the cells . The developed cells were harvested by washing the suspension three times in PB and then used in the experiments discussed below.
Bright field (BF) and TIRF microscopy were conducted on an Olympus IX81 setup, controlled with the software CellR. Observations of D. discoideum were carried out using a 60× PlanApo N oil immersion or a 20× LUCPlan FLN objective. The GFP linked to the DdLimE and cAR1 respectively was excited by the 488 nm line of a 20 mW Ar laser. BF and TIRF images were taken with a 16 bit, 1344 × 1024 pixel CCD camera (Hamamatsu Photonics). MATLAB (MathWorks) was used for data analysis. Brightness and contrast were adjusted using ImageJ . Confocal laser scanning microscopy was conducted on the Olympus Fluoview1000 setup, using a 60× UPlanSApo objective. Excitation of the GFP was provided by the 488 nm line of a 150 mW Ar laser. All flattening techniques have been characterized by taking a confocal z-stack, using cAR1-GFP cells. Since cAR1 is a membrane bound G-protein coupled receptor, cAR1-GFP marks the membrane of the D. discoideum cell. The confocal z-stacks were depth corrected as previously described .
2.3. Agar overlay
In the agar overlay method, the cell suspension is sandwiched between a layer of glass below and a sheet of agarose above. As fluid is removed from between these layers, the agar overlayer is lowered, and presses on the cells. A detailed description of the agar overlay method can be found in [12, 13]. Approximately 200 μl of a D. discoideum suspension in PB was placed on a cover slip (24 × 60 mm, No. 1, Menzel Gläser). An agar sheet (4% agarose, UltraPure, Invitrogen) of ca. 0.15 mm thickness was placed on top of the cell suspension. Cell flattening was induced by removal of PB with filter paper (Nr. 2, Whatman International). The degree of flattening could be controlled by removing different amounts of PB.
2.4. Oil overlay
The second flattening approach is based on an oil overlay, instead of an agar sheet. Similar to the agar overlay, the underlying principles of this method have long been established. For an early reference from the Dictyostelium literature see . Here, we proceeded as follows:
2.5. Microfabrication and device characterization
We used standard PDMS-based soft-lithography to fabricate microfluidic devices . A chrome mask (Cornell Nanofabrication Facility, Cornell University) was used to create a photoresist micro-pattern (SU8-25 or SU8-50, Microresist Chem) on a Si-wafer (polished, diameter 100 mm, SiMat) by photolithography. See the individual sections below for the different mask geometries. The height of the SU-8 pattern was measured with a white light interferometer (Wyko NT 1100, Veeco). Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, Sylgard 184, Dow Corning) was molded against the patterned master wafer. Air bubbles were removed in a vacuum chamber and the PDMS was then cured for 2 hours at 75°C. A block of PDMS carrying the imprint of the microstructure was cut out using a sharp knife. Inlets and outlets were punched into the PDMS with a clean syringe tip (19 gauge stainless steel, McMaster). The microstructured PDMS surface as well as the surface of the cover slip (24 × 60 mm, No. 1, Menzel Gläser) were treated by an air plasma for 5 minutes. Afterwards, bonding between the microstructured PDMS surface and the cover slip was initiated by bringing the two surfaces into contact with each other.
The microfluidic cell flattening devices described below commonly rely on changes in the height of the flattening chamber by deformation of the PDMS ceiling. Prior to a cell flattening experiment, a suspension of D. discoideum cells was filled into the microchannel through PTFE tubing (Novodirekt) via a 23 gauge sterile and sharpened syringe (Kruuse). The device was left for 15 minutes to allow the cells to settle down on the glass surface.
2.6. Single layer microfluidic device
Figure 2B shows the layout of the chrome mask used to fabricate the single layer microfluidic device. The final height of the microfluidic channel after spincoating the SU8-25 photoresist was 14 μm (the taller the microfluidic channel, the higher the flow speed required to flatten cells inside the channel). The area of the chamber, where experiments were carried out was 2 × 2 mm in size. It was stabilized by two rows of pillars (Figure 2B, in red), to prevent uncontrolled collapsing. We used 45 g of PDMS and 4.5 g of curing agent (100:10), to create a ca. 3 mm tall microfluidic device. After the device was assembled, it was heated at 75°C for 10 minutes to prevent an untimely, irreversible collapse of the chamber ceiling. The cells were loaded as described above. Then, the outlet was connected to a reservoir of PB (see Figure 2C). To lower the PDMS ceiling, PB was withdrawn from the channel at a constant rate using a syringe pump (PHD 2000, Harvard Apparatus). The degree of flattening depends on the suction rate. It is crucial to remove bubbles from the microchannel, the tubing, and the syringes, since they may expand in volume, leading to an uncontrolled drop in the actual flow speed in the microchannel.
2.7. Microfluidic closed-end actuator
The channels in the lower layer are 3 cm in length, 15 μm in height and 500 μm in width (Figure 3, PDMS I). This lower layer is made of a 100:9 mixture of PDMS to curing agent. Two cover slips (No. 1) are placed in the PDMS, on opposing sides of the structured pattern. These cover slips act as spacers, fixing the height of a third cover slip (24 × 60 mm, No. 1) placed across the microstructure (Figure 3D and 3E). After the PDMS cured, a rectangular block, containing the three channels is cut out. In this process, we must cut through the upper cover slip, so that the block consists of PDMS and the midsection of the upper cover slip. The ends of this cover glass, along with the spacers are left behind.
We take this block, and punch the inlet and outlet holes. Then, we carefully cut out the layer of PDMS above the embedded cover slip. It is critical that the corresponding cuts do not penetrate beyond the glass into the PDMS below; otherwise the channels will be damaged. The piece of PDMS, which was above the embedded cover slip, is put aside for use later. We remove all pieces of the cover glass from the main PDMS block. A fresh cover slip (22 × 40 mm, No. 1, Gold Seal) is placed on top of the thin midsection. The previously removed PDMS piece is replaced above the fresh glass (Figure 3F) and provides stability to the main block as it is plasma cleaned and bonded to a cover slip (24 × 60 mm, No. 1, Menzel Gläser). Finally, the stabilizing PDMS piece and cover glass are carefully removed from the block, and discarded. The lower layer is now assembled (PDMS I in Figure 3G).
The upper actuation channels are 1 cm in length, 30 μm in height and 500 μm in width (Figure 3, PDMS II). These closed-end channels are made from a 100:11 mixture of PDMS and curing agent. After curing, we cut out the PDMS block, and punch the inlets. We then plasma clean this upper layer with the previously assembled lower layer. We assemble the two layers such that the patterned side of the top layer (PDMS II in Figure 3G) is bonded on top of the mid-section of the bottom layer. The channels in the two layers are oriented perpendicular to each other. This concludes the construction of the closed-end actuation device.
We load the cells into the lower channel. After we allow the cells to settle and adhere to the glass substrate, we run a 5 μl/h flow of PB. The cells located in the region of overlap between the lower and upper channels (Figure 3G, marked in red) are the cells that can be flattened.
where Pactuation is the pressure in the actuation chamber, and Vpump is the volume injected by the syringe pump. By stopping the syringe pump, we can maintain a fixed pressure. To decrease the pressure, we simply run the syringe pump in reverse.
Note that, initially, the actuation channel is filled with air, but as pressure is applied, this air slowly permeates into the PDMS, and eventually will be displaced by water. This volume is negligible, when compared to V0, so the pressure equation above remains valid.
2.8. Microfluidic through-flow actuator
The microstructures were prepared by photolithography on two different master wafers. The layout of the first wafer, used for molding the actuation channel, was the same as for the single layer device (see Figure 2A) with a height of 28 μm. The actuation channel was made by covering the wafer with a layer of the PDMS (100:10) about 1 cm thick. To prepare the thin lower layer, we used a second wafer with a channel structure of 500 μm width and 24 μm height (Figure 4A). In order to distribute the PDMS uniformly, two spacers were used, each consisting of three cover slips (No. 1) that had been glued together. The spacers were taped to opposing edges of the wafer and a bubble-free PDMS (100:10) droplet was placed between them. The long edge of a thick glass slide was used to evenly spread the PDMS between the two spacers. Before curing the PDMS, the spacers were removed.
The actuation channel was cut out and holes were punched into the PDMS. After plasma cleaning, this PDMS block was bonded on top of the thin PDMS film on the master wafer, containing the lower channels. Then, the thin layer was cut along the edges of the PDMS block and the two bonded layers were carefully removed from the wafer. After this, holes for the lower channel were punched into the PDMS. The structured side of the device and a cover slip were plasma cleaned and bonded together as described. The assembled microfluidic through-flow actuator is displayed in Figure 4C. A suspension of D. discoideum LimE-GFP cells was filled into the lower channel. After 15 minutes, PB was supplied with a constant flow rate of 5 μl/h for the entire experiment. The pressure in the actuation channel was controlled by a metering valve, located between the channel inlet and the oxygen supply (0 to 1 bar above atmosphere) as shown in Figure 4D. The pressure was measured with a glycerin filled manometer (0 to 1 bar, Swagelok).
3.1. Overlay techniques
3.2. Single layer microfluidic device
The withdrawal speed of 250 μl/h was also used to flatten cAR1-GFP cells. The confocal x-y scans of a cell before flattening, and during flattening are shown in Figure 7B and 7C. The height of the cell decreased from 11 μm (Figure 7D) to ~4 μm (Figure 7E) in this device.
3.3. Double layer microfluidic devices
For the closed-end device, we saw that increasing the pressure in the actuation channel leads to a decrease of height of the lower channel from 15 μm to ~4 μm (Figure 8A) within approximately 70 seconds. The rates of pressurization and de-pressurization in the actuation channel are governed by the speeds at which the connected syringe pump runs. By running the syringe pump at the same rate, in reverse, we unflattened the lower channel in about the same amount of time it took to flatten. By using higher flow rates on the actuation syringe pump, or by decreasing the initial size of the air bubble in the actuation syringe (see the methods section above), we can decrease the time scales.
3.4. Application to TIRF microscopy
The confocal x-y scans of cAR1-GFP cells before and during flattening show a change from a rather irregular, ruffled geometry to a regular one, where the membrane is firmly pressed against the channel walls. This restriction improves TIRF imaging, since only the surface next to the glass can be visualized. A representative TIRF image of D. discoideum LimE-GFP cells for each method is shown in Figure 6B-F. The LimE-GFP label has been established as marker for filamentous actin . Previously, the actin dynamics in these cells was investigated for cells flattened by an agar overlayer. For each of the setups, the actin bundles are visible, implying that the cells have been confined to the glass surface by the individual techniques. Furthermore, in the supplementary material, we show a time lapse TIRF movie of cells in the single layer device (additional file 1).
We have presented classical overlay techniques and more elaborate microfluidic methods for flattening eukaryotic cells. Overlay techniques achieve cell flattening by the removal of the fluid between the glass floor and a confining top layer. The microfluidic approaches rely on applying a pressure difference across a deformable PDMS layer, which acts as a ceiling for the cell flattening chamber. The height of this PDMS ceiling is adjusted by changing this pressure difference.
We used the agar overlay technique as the reference to compare the stability, the degree of control, and the ease of operation for the various cell flattening techniques. The protocol is well known and tested. It has been used, for example, to apply mechanical stress to living cells  or to enhance live cell imaging by deforming cells into a quasi two-dimensional geometry . Also, agar overlay experiments have been performed where liquids have been added and removed during flattening . However, the removal and reintroduction of fluid underneath the agar overlay is difficult to perform and hard to control quantitatively, leaving a high risk of damaging the cells.
Variations of the oil overlay method have been used, for example, for the observation of quasi two-dimensional slugs of D. discoideum during its developmental cycle , as well as to investigate meiosis in insect spermatocytes . The oil overlay technique is harder to control than the agar overlay method. The height of the aqueous layer is dependent on the distance from the wick and suffers from variations due to the breakup of the wetting layer. Furthermore, controlled exchange of the aqueous medium is even more difficult to achieve than in the case of the agar overlay once the cells are confined underneath the oil layer. The oil overlay method also has a number of advantages compared to the agar overlay. For instance, if stable operating conditions are required, the oil overlay is preferable to the agar assay since the latter requires a humid environment to prevent it from drying. For a brief review of overlay techniques see also .
To complement the overlay techniques, we have developed single and double layer microfluidic devices to perform well-controlled flattening of living cells. The single layer device is the easiest to fabricate. The high aspect ratio, which is necessary for the operation of this device, allows many cells to be flattened at once. The relaxation time of this device, after flattening, is greater than 15 min. Therefore, this device has only limited applicability for repeated cycles of flattening and relaxing. Furthermore, it is often desirable to decouple the control of flattening from the fluid flow in the channel containing the cells. To accomplish this, an actuation channel is added above the cell flattening channel. In the first variant of this double layer device, the actuator is a closed-end channel, in the second variant, a through-flow channel.
The closed-end actuator is well-suited for long term microscopic imaging experiments, because no continuous flow in the actuation channel is necessary. On the other hand, the through-flow device allows the continuous delivery of oxygen to the cells through the permeable PDMS film between the upper and lower layers. When the pressure is released, these devices recover to their initial states within a minute (see Figures 8A and 9A). Note that the use of spacers to control the thickness of the PDMS film between the actuation and the compression channel makes our protocol less demanding in terms of equipment, when compared to the PDMS spin-coating approach that is commonly used for two-layer microfluidic fabrication [16, 24].
The main advantage of microfluidic methods compared to overlay techniques is the high level of control. Flattening can be tuned, and ranges from gentle cell compression, to immobilization by mechanical trapping, and destruction by bursting the cell membrane. Due to the continuous flow, the chemical environment of the cells can be much better controlled inside a microfluidic flattening device. On the one hand, the medium surrounding the cells is continuously exchanged, so that waste products and signaling substances released by the cells themselves are removed and a stationary chemical environment can be implemented. On the other hand, additional chemical factors may be added to the fluid flow and even modulated in the course of the experiment, so that flattening and chemical stimulation can be realized simultaneously. Note that additional valves may be required to add chemical species to the fluid flow upstream of the actual flattening chamber.
Despite these advantages, microfluidic techniques also have a number of drawbacks. Due to the rigidity of PDMS, the ceiling of the microfluidic flattening chambers will not adjust to the shape of the cells. In contrast, the overlay techniques will adapt to some extent to the morphology of the cells (Figure 5C and 5D). This can be advantageous if, for example, large mechanical stress on the nucleus has to be avoided. Besides, the manufacturing of microfluidic devices requires elaborate micro-fabrication techniques like photolithography and polymer molding. Consequently, the assembly of microfluidic devices is more time consuming than the overlay techniques. Usually it takes several days to setup a microfluidic device, beginning with the chrome mask generation. The operation of microfluidic setups is also considerably more expensive, since advanced tools like micro-liter syringes and precision pumps are required. Great care has to be taken to avoid leakage or inclusions of air in the tubing or the micro-chamber. Such gas inclusions would obstruct the stable operation of a microfluidic device because of their large compressibility. This is especially true for the single layer microfluidic device, which achieves flattening by withdrawing the liquid from the channel.
Comparison of the cell flattening devices
Control of Flattening
Control of Environment
no direct control1
< 1 hour
no direct control1
< 1 hour
via syringe pump
via actuation channel
yes (lower channel)
> 3 hours3
via actuation channel
yes (lower channel)
Christian Westendorf and Carsten Beta acknowledge financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the framework of the priority program SPP 1128. Christoph Erlenkämper acknowledges support by the graduate school 1276/1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. We thank G. Gerisch (MPI of Biochemistry, Munich) for providing the LimE-GFP labeled mutant and W.F. Loomis (University of California, San Diego) for providing the cAR1-GFP labeled mutant of Dictyostelium discoideum. We would like to thank Katharina Schneider and Barbara Kasemann for valuable technical assistance.
- Alon U: An Introduction to Systems Biology. 2006, Chapman and Hall/CRCMATHGoogle Scholar
- Yumura S, Fukui Y: Nature. 1985, 314 (6007): 194-196. 10.1038/314194a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kitanishiyumura T, Fukui Y: Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton. 1987, 8 (2): 106-117. 10.1002/cm.970080203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bretschneider T, Diez S, Anderson K, Heuser J, Clarke M, Muller-Taubenberger A, Kohler J, Gerisch G: Current Biology. 2004, 14 (1): 1-10. 10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kessin RH: Dictyostelium: evolution, cell biology, and the development of multicellularity. 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schneider N, Weber I, Faix J, Prassler J, Muller-Taubenberger A, Kohler J, Burghardt E, Gerisch G, Marriott G: Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton. 2003, 56 (2): 130-139. 10.1002/cm.10139.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiao Z, Zhang N, Murphy D, Devreotes P: Journal of Cell Biology. 1997, 139 (2): 365-374. 10.1083/jcb.139.2.365.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fey P, Kowal AS, Gaudet P, Pilcher KE, Chisholm RL: Nature Protocols. 2007, 2 (6): 1307-1316. 10.1038/nprot.2007.178.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chisholm R, Hopkinson S, Lodish H: Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1987, 84 (4): 1030-1034. 10.1073/pnas.84.4.1030.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rasband W: ImageJ. 1997, [http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/]Google Scholar
- Galbraith W: Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science. 1955, 96 (3): 285-288.Google Scholar
- Yumura S, Mori H, Fukui Y: Journal of Cell Biology. 1984, 99 (3): 894-899. 10.1083/jcb.99.3.894.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fukui Y, Yumura S, Yumura T, Mori H: Methods in Enzymology. 1986, 134: 573-580. full_text.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Potts G: Flora. 1902, 91: 281-347.Google Scholar
- Whitesides G, Ostuni E, Takayama S, Jiang X, Ingber D: Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2001, 3: 335-373. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.3.1.335.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim YC, Kang JH, Park SJ, Yoon ES, Park JK: Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical. 2007, 128 (1): 108-116. 10.1016/j.snb.2007.05.050.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Unger M, Chou H, Thorsen T, Scherer A, Quake S: Science. 2000, 288 (5463): 113-116. 10.1126/science.288.5463.113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feneberg W, Westphal M, Sackmann E: European Biophysics Journal with Biophysics Letters. 2001, 30 (4): 284-294.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Diez S, Gerisch G, Anderson K, Muller-Taubenberger A, Bretschneider T: Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005, 102 (21): 7601-7606. 10.1073/pnas.0408546102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clarke M, Mueller-Taubenberger A, Anderson KI, Engel U, Gerisch G: Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2006, 17 (11): 4866-4875. 10.1091/mbc.E06-04-0365.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neujahr R, Albrecht R, Kohler J, Matzner M, Schwartz J, Westphal M, Gerisch G: Journal of Cell Science. 1998, 111 (Part 9): 1227-1240.Google Scholar
- Bonner J: Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998, 95 (16): 9355-9359. 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9355.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fleming S, Rieder C: Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton. 2003, 56 (3): 141-146. 10.1002/cm.10143.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Squires T, Quake S: Reviews of Modern Physics. 2005, 77 (3): 977-1026. 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.977.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.